Judicial Review and Administrative Law · CAPE Law Unit 1

33 past-paper questions on Judicial Review and Administrative Law, part of Principles of Public Law, from every CAPE Law Unit 1 paper on Quelpr.

1. 410 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2005 · Paper 1Distinguish between judicial review of a decision and an appeal against a decision.
2. 510 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2005 · Paper 1Jones is stopped and searched by police at a roadblock while driving a heavily tinted jeep. Discuss the legal issues that arise if Jones challenges the police for acting beyond their powers.
3. 625 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2005 · Paper 2Mrs Gopthal, a senior public director, openly engages in political activities and is subsequently sent on early pre-retirement leave by the Permanent Secretary upon the Minister's order for conduct unbecoming a public…
4. 5(a)2 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2006 · Paper 1Define the term 'locus standi'.
5. 5(b)8 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2006 · Paper 1Explain whether Effie can successfully bring an action against the government.
6. 6(a)6 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2006 · Paper 1Using illustrations, distinguish between substantive ultra vires and procedural ultra vires.
7. 6(b)4 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2006 · Paper 1Explain whether the citizens can successfully challenge the Mayor's action.
8. 625 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2006 · Paper 2With reference to decided cases, discuss the use of judicial review of administrative action.
9. 625 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2008 · Paper 2With reference to decided cases and the constitution of a named Commonwealth Caribbean country, advise DCP Johns on the likely success of his challenge.
10. 7(b)13 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2008 · Paper 2Explain how ONE remedy available to Ms Ming supports her action against the government.
11. 6(a)12 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2008 (second paper) · Paper 2With reference to decided cases, advise Mrs Seebaran as to whether the Minister's action is appropriate.
12. 6(b)13 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2008 (second paper) · Paper 2With reference to decided cases, advise Mrs Seebaran as to the remedies that may be available to her.
13. 1(b)(ii)5 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2009 · Paper 2Outline the source of power of the High Court in a named Commonwealth Caribbean jurisdiction to review constitutional contraventions that do not involve the fundamental rights provision.
14. 6(a)15 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2009 · Paper 2With reference to decided cases, advise Davis whether he has a cause of action against the Comptroller of Customs.
15. 6(b)10 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2009 · Paper 2Advise as to the remedy that should be sought.
16. 7(a)(i)10 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2009 · Paper 2With reference to at least two decided cases, advise on the likely outcome of any action by Philip.
17. 7(a)(ii)6 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2009 · Paper 2Advise on the nature of the orders sought, if any.
18. 7(b)9 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2009 · Paper 2Explain whether it would have made any difference to the answer to (a) if the Fire Service Act provided that the decision of the Chief Fire Officer in any matter pertaining to the organization of the Fire Service "shall…
19. 425 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2010 · Paper 2Discuss the statement concerning the doctrine of ultra vires and public authorities exercising quasi-judicial functions exceeding statutory authority, citing decided cases.
20. 4(a)10 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2011 · Paper 2With reference to legal authority, outline five elements of 'the right to a fair hearing'.
21. 4(b)15 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2011 · Paper 2Advise the Minister of Home Affairs on considerations to bear in mind when deliberating the petition from the parents.
22. 325 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2012 · Paper 2Discuss the statement that the liberal approach to locus standi is better suited to the cause of litigants seeking judicial review than the restrictive approach, referring to decided cases.
23. 425 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2012 · Paper 2With reference to decided cases and the constitution of a named Commonwealth Caribbean state, advise Dr Biggs on her right to seek redress.
24. 4(a)10 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2013 · Paper 2Discuss the factors that the courts take into account in determining locus standi in judicial review applications, referring to TWO decided cases.
25. 4(b)15 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2013 · Paper 2Advise Bill on any grounds he may have for judicial review.
26. 4(a)20 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2014 · Paper 2Determine whether the Minister's direction is ultra vires Section 6 of the Act.
27. 4(b)5 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2014 · Paper 2Explain whether the PRB's determination is ultra vires the Minister's direction.
28. 3(b)15 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2015 · Paper 2Advise the Leader of the Opposition on whether there are any grounds for judicial review.
29. 4(i)5 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2015 · Paper 2Advise Morgan on whether he has locus standi, referring to one decided case.
30. 4(ii)5 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2015 · Paper 2Advise Morgan on whether the Blanco Secondary School is subject to judicial review, referring to one decided case.
31. 4(iii)10 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2015 · Paper 2Advise Morgan on the available grounds of review against the Blanco Secondary School, referring to one decided case.
32. 4(iv)5 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2015 · Paper 2Advise Morgan on two remedies available to him, referring to one decided case.
33. 3(b)15 marks· CAPE Law Unit 1 · 2016 · Paper 2Advise the COP whether he can challenge the lawfulness of his suspension and removal from office.