Quelpr

Research Methods and Evaluating Sources · CAPE Communication Studies

12 past-paper questions on Research Methods and Evaluating Sources, part of Module 1: Gathering and Processing Information, from every CAPE Communication Studies paper on Quelpr.

  1. 1(a)(i)2 marks· CAPE Communication Studies · 2005 · Paper 1/AList TWO data gathering methods, other than a questionnaire, suitable for this research.
  2. 1(a)(ii)4 marks· CAPE Communication Studies · 2005 · Paper 1/AState ONE strength and ONE weakness of EACH method listed in 1(a)(i).
  3. 1(b)2 marks· CAPE Communication Studies · 2005 · Paper 1/ASuggest TWO reasons why a questionnaire might NOT be suitable for collecting data for this research.
  4. 2(a)3 marks· CAPE Communication Studies · 2005 · Paper 1/AState THREE questions the students could ask farmers to obtain valid research data.
  5. 2(b)4 marks· CAPE Communication Studies · 2005 · Paper 1/AName FOUR sources, other than the farmers themselves, that could supply information regarding the farmers' transportation challenges.
  6. 1(a)4 marks· CAPE Communication Studies · 2006 · Paper 1/AState FOUR ways in which the questionnaire might be administered.
  7. 1(b)4 marks· CAPE Communication Studies · 2006 · Paper 1/ACompose FOUR questions that Arthur may have included in the questionnaire, ensuring they do NOT relate to biographical information.
  8. 2(a)3 marks· CAPE Communication Studies · 2006 · Paper 1/AIdentify THREE groups within the community that would be good sources of data for the research.
  9. 2(b)4 marks· CAPE Communication Studies · 2006 · Paper 1/AGive TWO reasons why it would NOT be appropriate to generalise the findings of this research.
  10. 1(iii)8 marks· CAPE Communication Studies · 2015 (GUY) · Paper 2Evaluate the validity of the information presented.
  11. 1(c)8 marks· CAPE Communication Studies · 2018 · Paper 2Evaluate the validity of the information presented, giving TWO reasons to support your answer.
  12. 1(c)9 marks· CAPE Communication Studies · 2021 · Paper 2Evaluate the credibility of the information presented.