CAPE Law Unit 2 · 2005 · Paper 2 · Question 5
Assess how far the statement by Diplock LJ in the Hong Kong Fir case ('There are . . . many contractual undertakings of a more complex character which cannot be categorised as being "conditions" or "warranties"') supports the view that 'innominate' or intermediate terms facilitate the courts' handling of breaches of contract, referring to relevant case law.
The mark scheme is shown once you've answered.
Practise this question